Subject: Re: [xsl] Wath is the opposite of the union operator? From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:58:57 +0100 |
Damn, i was close to it, but i've used the not() without the count() so i got a error, something like "expression does not evaluate to a node-set" or something. I solved my problem with a lot of if and for-each and it's horrible, i'll use your expression right away. Thanks for the quick and concise response. On 9/22/05, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > in xpath2 you use the except operator, in xpath 1 > $x1 except $x2 is > > $x1[not(count(.|$x2)=count($x2))] > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Wath is the opposite of t, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Wath is the opposite of t, António Mota |
[xsl] Removing namespace attributes, Hank Ratzesberger | Date | Re: [xsl] Wath is the opposite of t, António Mota |
Month |