Subject: RE: [xsl] Clark notation in XPath From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:00 +0100 |
> I actually prefer the notation that the WG recently introduced for > error messages - the namespace-uri followed by # followed by the local > name - one less character to type. I think the reason James used {uri}local in preference was that it was quicker to detect (just look at the first character). The uri#local form is more complex to process, especially in the case where the namespace URI itself contains a "#". But the choice of syntax is secondary: the main point is that it would be useful to have a syntax for expanded names that doesn't require prefixes to be declared. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Clark notation in XPath, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Clark notation in XPath, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] stylesheet for generating, Ragulf Pickaxe | Date | RE: [xsl] Clark notation in XPath, Michael Kay |
Month |