Subject: Re: [xsl] encoding on parameters for document function (using saxon) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:32:26 +0100 |
> To me it seems potentially full of confusion. Why on earth re-use an > existing term with a completely different meaning (URI reference), > when the term IRI -reference already exists with the required meaning? It's traditional usage of "URI" in XML-land though isn't it? Eg the xml spec itself says.... > System identifiers (and other XML strings meant to be used as URI > references) MAY contain characters that, according to [IETF RFC 2396] > and [IETF RFC 2732], must be escaped before a URI can be used to > retrieve the referenced resource. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] encoding on parameters fo, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] encoding on parameters fo, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] encoding on parameters fo, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] encoding on parameters fo, Michael Kay |
Month |