Re: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 output XML (Performance Issue)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 output XML (Performance Issue)
From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:54:36 -0400
Kusunam, Srinivas wrote:
Mike,
      SAXON did improve the performance more than 10 times comparing to
XALAN. I wonder why people are still using XALAN. Are there any specific
areas where XALAN performs better than SAXON??


I use Xalan because I have found bugs in Saxon that Dr. Kay has told me he will not fix, and I do not feel comfortable working on that code base myself. Xalan is a supported and maintained product. All the bugs I have found in Xalan have been fixed, and I am confident that any I find in the future will also be fixed. For me, a correct, reliable implementation trumps speed.


--
o;?Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

Current Thread