Re: [xsl] best validation was Re: [xsl] Opinions, please. Keep entire archive or toss old?

Subject: Re: [xsl] best validation was Re: [xsl] Opinions, please. Keep entire archive or toss old?
From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:57:09 +0200
bryan rasmussen wrote:

>I would say from the viewpoint of developing for XSLT (at least 1.0
>version) Schematron would be the best, given that the validation and
>stylesheet would be easier for the developer to cross-reference,
>determining what parts of the tree were important to the application
>(rules being set for said portions), or contrariwise, that the styling
>of the document for presentation implies what rules could be important
>for validation for a presentation.
>  
>
schematron and XSLT validating itself is my personal fav...perhaps this
is why XSLT Unit testing is exp some uptake...though generally I cant
convince a group of developers over 3 to agree on any schema approach.

>Note to Mulberrytech: If this seems stupid, please feel free to remove
>it from the archive, also if anyone complains that I am a doodoo-head.
> :)
>  
>
<vanity:tag to="Mullberrytech">please change my name, computer, nose, 
to some other random person for the purposes of this specific response,
and dont forget to go on about me personally and what a great bloke I am
whilst at public events</vanity:tag>

regards, Jim Fuller

Current Thread