Subject: Re: [xsl] document() source From: "Evert-Jan Stoel" <info@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:04:53 +0200 |
Hi Fraser, Yes, the doment should be on the file system, but is is possible to call a java or php file and let the file output the xml as a string. I had a same problem and found that this worked nicely. greetings Evert-Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: [xsl] document() source > I have a need to process 2 XML instances in a single piece of XSLT (I'm > doing some x doc validation). > > I see that in XSLT I can use the document() function BUT it APPEARS that it > must retrieve the XML from the file system or a resolvable URI ?? > > In my case the second instance doc is already 'in memory' (having been > retrieved from a database) so I really just want to pass the XML itself as a > string. > > Also, because the production environment in which the solution will be > deployed is (naturally) constrained, getting access to the file system to > create a temporary file is unlikely to be possible (plus performance could > be an issue for some of the quite large XML docs we use). > > Does anyone know whether this is possible using XSLT, or will I need to look > at a programmatic (ie. Java) implementation alternative :-( > > Fraser.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() source, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] document() source, Per Jessen |
Re: [xsl] document() source, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] Using document() for mult, Michael Kay |
Month |