Subject: Re: [xsl] News From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:27:36 GMT |
> How did you end up handling "order by", which is the only XQuery construct There are some skimpy notes (mainly cribbed from an earlier email exchange on this list) at http://monet.nag.co.uk/xq2xml/xq2xslnotes.html#s6 But I'm miffed at the XQuery Test suite which claims I fail half the OrderBy tests (unless I were to switch to Saxon -SA rather than -B) http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1997 > with no obvious translation to XSLT? Actually it's the "details" where the Obviousness of the translation is less than one might hope. orderBy is as it is, but differences in white space handling, namespace copying, and the set of built in types supported at the basic conformance level account for most of the complication in the code of xq2xsl. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] News, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 stat, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] News, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Root element attributes, shailesh |
Month |