Subject: Re: [xsl] Image Tage Bug From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 21:58:36 +0000 |
It is not correct to say that, since XHTML is some kind of a "special" XML file with some limited number of tags defined, if one uses only those specific tags and specifies XML output, so the ouput will be XHTML? I wonder if my question make sense, i hope so... On 11/5/05, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I believe with xslt 2.0 you can specify an output method of > > xhtml > > yes > > > - but with > > xslt 1.0 I am not sure if there is any commonly accepted way > > to do this > > There's no standard way to do it in XSLT 1.0. Some processors offer suitable > extensions. > > On the other hand, I wonder whether there is really a need to do it? If the > receiving application is a browser, you might as well generate HTML. If the > receiving application requires XML, then generate XML: the special > serialization tweaks used in XHTML are needed only for browsers designed to > handle HTML. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Image Tage Bug, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Image Tage Bug, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Concordance with XSLT, Robert Koberg | Date | RE: [xsl] Image Tage Bug, Michael Kay |
Month |