Subject: Re: [xsl] Document() function: GET vs. POST From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 12 Nov 2005 08:04:20 +0000 |
>>>>> "Brian" == granam <granam@xxxxxxx> writes: Brian> The Document() function can do an HTTP GET. Your assertion is far too strong. Try: The Document() function might result in an HTTP GET being performed. Then add: This is most likely to happen if the URI is an http scheme URI, but it might not happen for such a URI, and it might happen for other URI schems. Brian> Could it do an HTTP POST? Yes. Brian> It would be quite useful to be able to interact with web Brian> services which use a more complex HTTP POST interface. Can Brian> this be done, or is that possibly something for the future? I presume you meant to say: "Do any XSLT processors do this now, or is that possibly something for the future?" In which case my answers would be: 1) Not that I know of, and 2) This is of course possible - depending on what you mean by interact. You can probably right a URI resolver to do this. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Document() function: GET vs. , granam | Thread | Re: [xsl] Document() function: GET , bryan rasmussen |
Re: [xsl] xquery to xslt update, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] triggering xslt-functions, bryan rasmussen |
Month |