Subject: Re: [xsl] second implementation of XSLT 2.0? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:54:32 -0500 |
Before a W3C Candidate Recommendation advances to Proposed Recommendation status, "the Working Group should be able to demonstrate two interoperable implementations of each feature."[1] So far, we've got Saxon for 2.0, but what else?
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] second implementation of , Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] second implementation of , M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] second implementation of , M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] second implementation of , M. David Peterson |
Month |