RE: [xsl] FXSL and 'saxon:function()'

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dimitre's implementation of higher-order functions has the advantage of
being done in pure XSLT, without requiring any extensions. I provided
saxon:function() primarily for XQuery, because (a) it's not possible to use
Dimitre's technique in XQuery as it lacks apply-templates, and (b) by
providing higher-order functions, many of the more advanced capabilities of
XSLT 2.0 such as for-each-group and analyze-string can be offered to XQuery
users with requiring custom syntax.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

>
>   I first heard about FXSL a fee weeks ago on XSL-List.  I
> seen there was a Saxon-specific implementation, that is now
> removed from the release manager.  Is this a choice?
>
>   I just see Saxon has native HOF.  Is would be intresting
> to have a Saxon-specific FXSL that uses these native HOF?
> So the intresting pqrt of FXSL will not be qnymore to
> provide HOF, but in the functions library it provides.
>
>   Does this make sense?
>
>   Regards,
>
> --drkm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________
> Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau
> Yahoo! Messenger
> Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com