Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation .NET|
From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:48:21 -0700
I'm sorry, I left out my *rant* on .net datasets persisted to xml. So, what is wrong with the original ADO save recordset as xml? At first glance, sure the xml was difficult to read, but truly is a great xml document to work with! Didn't anyone ever mention in the microsoft camp there that xml elements named as field names is a bad idea? That it is a much more useful source if the xml elements are all named the same? Do I *rant* alone? Karl..