Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation .NET From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:48:21 -0700 |
I'm sorry, I left out my *rant* on .net datasets persisted to xml. So, what is wrong with the original ADO save recordset as xml? At first glance, sure the xml was difficult to read, but truly is a great xml document to work with! Didn't anyone ever mention in the microsoft camp there that xml elements named as field names is a bad idea? That it is a much more useful source if the xml elements are all named the same? Do I *rant* alone? Karl..
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT Transformation .NET, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation ., Michael Kay |
[xsl] XSLT Transformation .NET, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | [xsl] XSLT Processing w/ Embedded P, Michael B Allen |
Month |