|
Subject: [xsl] xdt:yearMonthDuration eq xs:duration From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 01:05:13 +0000 |
Saxon 8.6 fails this expression with XPTY0004, "Cannot compare
xdt:yearMonthDuration to xs:duration":
xdt:yearMonthDuration("P200Y2M") eq xs:duration("P200Y2M")
The XPath 2.0 book specifies these operators:
A eq B xdt:yearMonthDuration xdt:yearMonthDuration
A eq B xdt:dayTimeDuration xdt:dayTimeDuration
A eq B xs:duration xs:duration
It also says this:
<quote>
Any operator listed in the operator mapping tables may be validly applied to
an operand of type AT if the table calls for an operand of type ET and
type-matches(ET, AT) is true (see 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching). For example,
a table entry indicates that the gt operator may be applied to two xs:date
operands, returning xs:boolean. Therefore, the gt operator may also be
applied to two (possibly different) subtypes of xs:date, also returning
xs:boolean.
</quote>
Doesn't type-matches(xs:duration, xdt:yearMonthDuration) hold true? My point
being that the expression should succeed because xdt:yearMonthDuration is a
subtype of xs:duration and that the xs:duration-eq operator therefore can be
applied. If that is the case, which I doubt, the eq/ne operators for the two
XDT durations are redudant, since the xs:duration-eq/ne operators covers
them.
What clause in any of the specifications disallow the above operand
combination? (and the others variations by the same principle)
Thanks in advance,
Frans
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Pagebreaks in Excel-to-HTML t, Oleg Konovalov | Thread | RE: [xsl] xdt:yearMonthDuration eq , Michael Kay |
| Re: [xsl] What does the phrase "dup, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] What does the phrase "dup, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Month |