Subject: RE: [xsl] Difference between XSL and XSLT From: cknell@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:58:58 -0500 |
I'll stick my neck out. As you say, XSLT is a subset of XSL, the other part is XSL-FO. Together they comprise XSL. The simple answer to "... what [is] the difference between XSLT and XSL is, or why we should use the one over the other ...", is, the difference between XSLT and XSL is that XSLT is one of the two parts of XSL. Your audience can't use one over the other. XSL isn't anything you can use. You can use it's constituent parts. You can't use paint instead of latex paint. Just plain "paint" doesn't exist. It's latex, or oil-based, or whatever, but there isn't anything that's just "paint". -- Charles Knell cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email -----Original Message----- From: Khorasani, Houman <Houman.Khorasani@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:45:33 -0000 To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [xsl] Difference between XSL and XSLT Hello, I am having a presentation on Monday about XML, XSLT and XSD. I am wondering what if they ask me what the difference between XSLT and XSL is, or why we should use the one over the other...I didn't know how to respond. I know XSLT is a subset o XSL. But still a bit confusing to explain why to use XSLT rather than XSL or vice versa... Any comment? Thanks Houman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Difference between XSL an, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Difference between XSL an, Khorasani, Houman |
Re: [xsl] Difference between XSL an, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Difference between XSL an, António Mota |
Month |