Subject: Re: [xsl] select immediately following siblings with constraints? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:13:13 -0500 |
Thank you very much for the reply. I actually hadn't been aware of the << and >> operators, I shall have to read up on them.
I did think about using a for loop, I just wasn't sure how I could write one which would be efficent, which wouldn't end up taking a lot more time than necessary to run down the remaining following-sibling elements.
((for $b in following-sibling::b[1] return following-sibling::a[. << $b]), (following-sibling::a[not(current()/following-sibling::b)]))
((for $b in following-sibling::b[1] return following-sibling::a[. << $b]), (for $s in . return following-sibling::a[not($s/following-sibling::b)]))
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] select immediately follow, James A. Robinson | Thread | Re: [xsl] select immediately follow, James A. Robinson |
[xsl] An all-in-one XML data set (u, Graves, Jim \(CONTR\ | Date | RE: [xsl] Problems with mixed conte, Michael Kay |
Month |