Subject: Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parameters to generic templates From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:06:17 -0400 |
In an AVT the values get concatenated using a space separator... but I'm guessing you meant as arguments to functions...
I disagree with your second point though, using (..)[1] should be avoided as it will hide the fact that you selected multiple nodes when you only wanted one - this is the real strength of 2.0 over 1.0 - in 1.0 you would only trap this by examining the output, in 2.0 you get an error.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parame, andrew welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] rephrased: passing parame, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] rephrased: passing parame, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] rephrased: passing parame, Michael Kay |
Month |