Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - repost

Subject: Re: [xsl] Transforming Tables - repost
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:27:28 +0100
> but if i use this in this input:

you mean actually test the code by running it rather than typing it
straight into mail messages? that will never catch on...

> and the current node is in the cell 1 row 3 then there is
> preceding-sibling::cell[1], 

?? If you are on the first cell of a row there is no preceding-sibling.
Note I'm using preceding-sibling::cell not preceding::cell


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:

Current Thread