Subject: RE: [xsl] Need help for XSL beautifaction From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:39:14 +0100 |
> I wonder if Michael could comment on the optimization of those > constructs: Would the <xls:if> be faster to execute than the XPath? Saxon will generate identical code for all three cases. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > > Just curious... > > (Obviously one should always profile before optimization, but > Dr. Kay is well informed to comment...) > > - -- > ============== > +----------------------------------------------+ > Martin Gadbois | "Windows might take you from 0 to 60 > faster, | > S/W Developer | but to go to 100 you need Unix." > | > Colubris Networks Inc. > +----------------------------------------------+ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFEa0II9Y3/iTTCEDkRAmYJAJ0f5jwey2GOWz79A3EDiZiWPbm9hwCfckn4 > un76rxXaqExznhnbUs8GVIU= > =LukS > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Need help for XSL beautif, Martin Gadbois | Thread | [xsl] remove relative path, Gav.... |
Re: [xsl] Need help for XSL beautif, Christian Haase | Date | Re: [xsl] Need help for XSL beautif, Jon Gorman |
Month |