Subject: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and the Adobe "Save as PDF" From: Dennis Barb <dennisxmlwork@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 10:17:10 -0700 (PDT) |
So, after all that background, the question is: At 10:46 AM -0600 6/3/06, M. David Peterson wrote: >Does providing the ability to save a Word document as PDF natively, >out-of-the-box (apparently they will counteract the apparent demand >by Adobe by providing the support as a separate download) provide >even greater opportunity for XSL-FO by increasing the number of PDF >documents, or does it hurt XSL-FO my making it less relevant to the >needs of the printing industry? Or is it simply not relevant? I suggest that whatever Microsoft may do to add an XML veneer to Word, it will remain an unstructured word processor. While it may be possible to use future versions of Word to create user-defined XML (doing it with the current version is akin to writing by shaping cooked spaghetti into words), the vast majority of Word users will use it as an unstructured tool. So, what ever capabilities are provided for presenting the documents are irrelevant to XSL-FO. XSL-FO is a technology for presenting STRUCTURED documents. So, any change to the output options of Word won't affect the market for display tools for structured documents. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , Winchel 'Todd' Vince | Thread | Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , M. David Peterson |
[xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and the , M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] Office 2007, XSL-FO, and , M. David Peterson |
Month |