Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mode="#all" ? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:08:56 +0100 |
I think the only time I've used it is for a catch-all: <xsl:template match="*" mode="#all"> <xsl:message terminate="yes">No template provided for element ....</xsl:message> </xsl:template> or <xsl:template match="*" mode="#all"> <xsl:comment>start processing element ...</xsl:comment> <xsl:next-match/> <xsl:comment>end processing element ...</xsl:comment> </xsl:template> I think the theory was that if system-defined built-in templates can apply to all modes, then user-defined templates should have the same capability. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitre Novatchev [mailto:dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 06 June 2006 13:52 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mode="#all" ? > > I was wondering if somebody could provide an example where using > > mode="#all" > > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#modes) > > is necessary and useful. > > > It seems to me that using this feature can be dangerous and > harmful -- when should we recommend it? > > -- > Cheers, > Dimitre Novatchev > --------------------------------------- > Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant > intelligence.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mod, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mod, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mod, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Reasons for mod, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |