Re: [xsl] XPath question

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath question
From: "andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:55:03 +0100
On 6/7/06, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris,

Doesn't your problem reduce to the first c node descendant?

/descendant::c[1]

?

With XSLT 1.0's first item semantics, couldn't you reduce that to:


/descendant::c

(not that that is a good a idea...)

Current Thread