|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Finding the first among equals using XPath From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:58:05 +0100 |
> I am stuck with using XSL 1.0
xslt2's for-each-group makes it easier (or at least easier to read) but
any xslt 1 grouping construct would work here. Muenchian grouping (ie
using keys) is the usual approach, but making the keys unique in
subtrees rooted at each W is a bit tiresome, so unless you have 100's of
X below each W I'd just write it directly in XPath
something like
<xsl:for-each select="W">
<xsl:for-each select="X[not(@Y=../following-sibling::X/@Y)]">
something
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Finding the first among equal, Peter Riocreux | Thread | Re: [xsl] Finding the first among e, Wendell Piez |
| Re: [xsl] Merging attributes in one, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Finding the first among e, G. Ken Holman |
| Month |