Subject: Re: [xsl] Finding the first among equals using XPath From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:58:05 +0100 |
> I am stuck with using XSL 1.0 xslt2's for-each-group makes it easier (or at least easier to read) but any xslt 1 grouping construct would work here. Muenchian grouping (ie using keys) is the usual approach, but making the keys unique in subtrees rooted at each W is a bit tiresome, so unless you have 100's of X below each W I'd just write it directly in XPath something like <xsl:for-each select="W"> <xsl:for-each select="X[not(@Y=../following-sibling::X/@Y)]"> something David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Finding the first among equal, Peter Riocreux | Thread | Re: [xsl] Finding the first among e, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Merging attributes in one, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Finding the first among e, G. Ken Holman |
Month |