Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] Some common, generic grouping problems From: "Christian Roth" <roth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:43:21 +0200 |
David Carlisle wrote: >> That is of course if I've scaled up the input correctly, no comment >> from the OP so far. > >Yes I was going to mention last night that some of the code made some >assumptions that may or may not have been correct about the input. >In all cases for example the methods I suggested would be very >intollerent of any input that didn't have dark//ligght matching >exactly. It would be possible to code it up more defensively to trap >such cases and give warnings etc. I am aware of these problems - reduced, minimal examples cannot accurately describe real-life scenarios. But on the other hand, I find complex examples hard to handle and learn from. This is why my main goal (as mentioned in my earlier post) is to grasp the basic *idea* (algorithm, concept) backing a specific solution implementation so that I am hopefully able to transfer that knowledge to the actual (often much more complex) problem at hand. This is not to mean that giving actual XSLT code is bad! Most often, it will nicely help demonstrate how that idea can be efficiently implemented. -Christian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] Some common, gene, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] Some common, gene, David Carlisle |
[xsl] using collection(), Marijan Madunic | Date | Re: [xsl] Moving (promoting) XML el, Mark Peters |
Month |