Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?
From: "Tracey Zellmann" <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:00:38 -0400
Thanks . I'll take the time to digest it.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?



"Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey.zellmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so Tracey> important and so difficult for me.

   Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and
   Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy?  Those made a lot of
   Tracey> sense to me.

   Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement
   Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not
   Tracey> necessary.)

http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html


-- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire

Current Thread