|
Subject: Re: [xsl] For-each and keys() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:21:38 +0100 |
> I suppose I can't believe that you'd actually make use of anything if
> you're unwilling to test code because the document() was capitalized
> when it was copied to this list.
I think the archives of the list will show otherwise.
It wasn't just that it's capitalised, I have no idea what your input
looks like given that you clearly state that
> Disabilities is not the top-level of that document. That is what I meant.
yet the sample input that you posted was
XML below
<disabilities>
with (lowercase) disabilities as the top level element, and the code
apparently expected that .... $Definitions/disabilities">...
The xsl-list guidelines, posted only yesterday say
- Illustrating your question with a demonstration of the
problem. Well-composed questions frequently include a small XML
sample, an XSLT stylesheet, the results received, and the result
that was desired - all in miniature, to make it comprehensible to
readers new to your problem. (It is also not uncommon to discover
what a problem actually is in the process of reducing it to an
illustrative version.)
David
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] For-each and keys(), Steve | Thread | Re: [xsl] For-each and keys(), G. Ken Holman |
| Re: [xsl] For-each and keys(), Steve | Date | Re: [xsl] For-each and keys(), G. Ken Holman |
| Month |