Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:51:14 +0100 |
> That would be true in a naive implementation... ah well I'm a very naive person:-) In other comments in the thread I did try to indicate that an actual implemenattion may do whatever it does, which might not accord with a literal (or one might say naive) reading, of the spec, so long as the observable behaviour is the same. Thanks as always for keeping the thread on track. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:sequence, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, tom tom |
RE: [xsl] Xpath and Ranges, Ted Henry | Date | Re: [xsl] Use of separator, David Carlisle |
Month |