|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Test for the immediately preceding-sibling From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:39:19 +0200 (CEST) |
Rick Quatro wrote:
> //related-article/article-title[preceding-sibling::person-group]
In plain English, you want the first preceding sibling element, if it
is a person-group element. So:
preceding-sibling::*[1][self::person-group]
Note: try to avoid name() to test element names when you know them
statically.
Regards,
--drkm
p4.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Aug 26 13:13:40 GMT 2006
___________________________________________________________________________
Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet !
Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences.
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Test for the immediately prec, Rick Quatro | Thread | RE: [xsl] Test for the immediately , cknell |
| RE: [xsl] Test for the immediately , cknell | Date | Re: [xsl] Sort before paging, B Tommie Usdin |
| Month |