Subject: RE: [xsl] Data Relativity Question From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:54:03 +0100 |
> Hmm. (Using Saxon 8) When I put the small file as input on > the command line, the process chokes -- Java throws a fit. > When I put the big file on the command line, it runs > properly. Interesting. > > Probably not important, but I thought I'd follow up with a > bit of empirical results. :-) It's entirely plausible that one algorithm should use a lot more memory than another, but without seeing the code, it's not possible to contribute any insights. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Data Relativity Question, Bob Portnell | Thread | [xsl] Type error with variable as=, Trevor Nicholls |
[xsl] Ignoring a child element, Emily.Garrett | Date | [xsl] Relationships in for-each sta, Bob Portnell |
Month |