Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling help please. From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:40:08 +0100 |
> David, I actually do not want to group them together as I need > everything on the second level even though logically their should be > a parent for each "set". You should still use for-each-group, it doesn't add any element grouping around eaach group, it just hands you teh children a bunch at a time, starting with each header element, which is just what you want. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] following-sibling help pl, Danny Leblanc | Thread | [xsl] Problem with xslfo, meenakshi n |
Re: [xsl] Re: Ignoring Duplicates I, Bob Portnell | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT functions in XPath, Owen Rees |
Month |