Subject: Re: [xsl] De-Duplification revisited (Was: Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"?) From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:33:40 +0100 |
I argue, why not use the word de-duplication itself. Sometimes pseudo words are necessary to describe a concept.
In my opinion word "nub" is not ok for this. It is very less heard off, and looks very non-english. Perhaps it is an english word, but my vocabulary is limited :)
On 10/13/06, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Reflecting on the recent discussion on finding a better word for "de-duplication" and in particular for "de-duplicated", here is what name is used in Haskell:
nub
Here's the definition from the List.hs library module:
nub :: (Eq a) => [a] -> [a] nub = nubBy (==)
nubBy :: (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a] nubBy eq [] = [] nubBy eq (x:xs) = x : nubBy eq (filter (\y -> not (eq x y)) xs)
So, in Haskellese, de-duplicated will be just "nubbed".
From dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nub) :
4 results for: nub
-noun 1. the point, gist, or heart of something.
To summarize, the best word for de-duplicate that I've found up to now is the word "nub".
I hope that if in case we cannot come with a better word, we will at least use the word "nub"
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
-- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] De-Duplification revisite, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] De-Duplification revisite, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] De-Duplification revisite, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] De-Duplification revisite, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |