Subject: Re: [xsl] short and long empty xml elements From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:20:01 +0200 |
I do completely aggree. The point is that the target system is not in our responsability but is used by a customer. I already tried to convince the customer to replace the system: no way. So we can try to find a nasty solution or we risk to loose the customer. We voted for the first way.
What would you do if you agreed to communicate with the customer using email, and then found that the customer's SMTP server didn't conform to any recognized standards? Would you go to an SMTP mailing list and ask how to bend the standard products to align them with your customer's buggy implementation?
<script type="text/javascript" src="somfile.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="somfile.js" />
Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] short and long empty xml , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] short and long empty xml , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Newbie Question: Creating, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Newbie Question: Creating, Richard Lewis |
Month |