Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question

Subject: Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question
From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:59:39 +0100 (CET)
David Carlisle wrote:

> > So I guess the processor is already an XSLT 2.0

> no, it was xalan:-)

  Mmh, I wonder what was exactly the input the OP did give to the
processor.  Because after the discussion, the "my" prefix had to appear
only in xsl:function/@name.  And if it was the case, I don't understand
how Xalan can complain about the "my" prefix not declared.




Yahoo! Mail riinvente le mail ! Dicouvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface rivolutionnaire.

Current Thread