Subject: Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:59:39 +0100 (CET) |
David Carlisle wrote: > > So I guess the processor is already an XSLT 2.0 > no, it was xalan:-) Mmh, I wonder what was exactly the input the OP did give to the processor. Because after the discussion, the "my" prefix had to appear only in xsl:function/@name. And if it was the case, I don't understand how Xalan can complain about the "my" prefix not declared. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail riinvente le mail ! Dicouvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface rivolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, David Carlisle |
Month |