Subject: Re: [xsl] key() and ordering of resulting node-set From: Ronan Klyne <ronan.klyne@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:50:45 +0000 |
Ah! I was reading the 1.0 spec, and couldn't find an explicit statement of ordering. FYI, XT seems to return nodes in reverse document order... # r James A. Robinson wrote: >> Is it possible to guarantee the ordering of the node-set returned by key()? >> If not, is it possible to force the order to document order? >> I have looked to the spec, but to no avail... > > According to the 2.0 CR it is document order: > > The result of the function is a sequence of nodes, > in document order and with duplicates removed > > from http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#keys > > Jim > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > James A. Robinson jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Stanford University HighWire Press http://highwire.stanford.edu/ > +1 650 7237294 (Work) +1 650 7259335 (Fax) > > -- Ronan Klyne Business Collaborator Developer Tel: +44 (0)870 163 2555 ronan.klyne@xxxxxxxxxxx www.groupbc.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] key() and ordering of res, James A. Robinson | Thread | RE: [xsl] key() and ordering of res, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Identify transform with d, Peter Szinek | Date | [xsl] Creating newspaper columns wi, Jacqueline Radebaugh |
Month |