RE: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT

Subject: RE: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:42:46 -0000

> Yes, certainly, but not:
> 
>     Dimitre>        -- camelCase notation
> 
> This is a very bad convention.

You're stuck with the fact that:

* XSLT names are hyphenated

* XML Schema names are camelCase

* names in the source and target vocabulary might be anything

So for stylesheet-defined names (variables, templates, functions) etc, you
can't be consistent with everyone. It's often best to follow the source
document vocabulary conventions.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT, (continued) Michael Kay - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:05:08 -0000 bryan rasmussen - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:08:11 +0100 Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:51:27 -0800 Colin Paul Adams - 24 Nov 2006 17:23:02 +0000 Michael Kay - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:42:46 -0000 <= Robert Koberg - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:24:46 -0500 Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:29:33 -0800 Colin Paul Adams - 25 Nov 2006 06:33:47 +0000 Dimitre Novatchev - Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:47:15 -0800

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Colin Paul Adams	Thread	Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Robert Koberg
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Colin Paul Adams	Date	[xsl] Transform inline-block type e, Christian Roth
	Month