Subject: Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT From: Rashmi Rubdi <dev_subscriptions@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:44:21 -0800 (PST) |
>>Just some points of clarification: >> 1. Am I correct is saying, what you are talking about is of more use for >> those using XSLT 2.0? >>2. As far as sorting is concerned, this saves having a second sort, but >>aside from the performance benefit, there is not much you gain? >>Basically, I am trying to understand how useful this is to those of us >>stuck with XSLT 1.x. On second thought, it looks like XPath1.0 doesn't have a rich set of date functions when compared to XPath2.0. I haven't tested the use of full date format CCYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS in XSLT1.0 and XPath1.0 , it might be more trouble than it's worth if you are using XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 since there are not many date/time functions in XPath1.0. So, you might as well use the original format suggested YYYY-MM-DD _____________________________________________________________________________ _______ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Rashmi Rubdi | Thread | [xsl] Custom Ordered Lists, Philip Vallone |
[xsl] I'm trying to convert fixed w, Murali P | Date | [xsl] Transform object and pass in , Murali P |
Month |