Re: [xsl] Axis specifers

[xslt.new <xslt.new@xxxxxxxxx>]

you say
> .> If a 'note' element appeared immediately after the list element,
> but your example input didn't have a note after the list element, and
> your posted code only appeared to be looking at child elements of list,
> not following siblings.

My bad. What I meant was if there was a note element immediately
following another note element like this:

<list>
<note>
<note>
<text>
</list>

I want both the note elements to appear above the text element. Right
now, with my code, the second NOTE element overlaps with the number 1.

On 1/16/07, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   This is the reason for the statement " <xsl:if
>  test="child::note">
>  <xsl:apply-templates select="note" mode="list"/> </xsl:if>"
>
> Michael's point was that teh xsl:if there is doing nothing, those lines
> are equivalent to
>  <xsl:apply-templates select="note" mode="list"/>
>
> as in both cases, if there is a note, templates are applied, and if
> there is not a note, templates are not applied.
>
> Your example
>
>
>   <list>
>    <note><para>This is the first note.</para></note>
>   <note><para>This is the second note. </para></note>
>   <text><para>This is some text. </para></text>
>   <note><para>This note is after the text. </para></note>
>    </list>
>
>   So, only if the <note> element appeared before the text, it will have
>   to be displayed before the text element like this:
>
>   NOTE: This is the first note.
>   NOTE: This is the second note.
>   1. This is some text.
>
> doesn't seem to involve any rearrangement at all and just needs
> something like
>
> <xsl:template match="list">
> <block>
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </block>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="note">
> <block>NOTE:
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </block>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="text">
> <block><xsl:number/>.
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </block>
> </xsl:template>
>
> you say
> .> If a 'note' element appeared immediately after the list element,
> but your example input didn't have a note after the list element, and
> your posted code only appeared to be looking at child elements of list,
> not following siblings.
>
> David