Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived From: Antony Quinn <aquinn@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:01:52 +0000 |
On 1/23/07, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I agree: think of all those AJAX applications transforming SOAP/REST XML to HTML that could benefit from XSLT 2.0Seriously though, it doesnt matter whether the browser supports it - just run the transforms on your server for dynamic pages or offline for static - let the browsers worry about rendering XHTML.
I think having XSLT 2.0 support on browser will be useful. Using XSLT 2.0 on server side is certainly an alternative. But for e.g., I just have a plain HTTP Web Server with no Java support (Servlets, JSP etc), then I can serve XML+XSLT to the browser, and the browser can do the transformation.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Colin Adams |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Jay Bryant |
Month |