Subject: Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xsl/xslt stylesheets From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:53:17 +0530 |
I think technically, you can have any extension for your XSLT files (except you should avoid using extensions used by popular softwares - like .doc, .xls etc).
But I think it's a good practice to name pure XSLT files with .xslt extension. .xsl extension is normally used for files having XSLT + XSL-FO code.
(but personally, I use extension .xsl even for pure XSLT files -- as it doesn't really matter, and I can type file names quickly).
Hello,
just a questions concerning the naming conventions for XSLT stylesheets:
Do XSL stylesheets ALWAYS have to be in a file with filen name extension *.xsl ?
What about XSLT docs in *.xslt or even in *.xml files?
Is there a must on how to name XSLT stylesheets or only a recommendation ?
Are there differences in handling between XSLT 1.x and 2.0 versions ?
Ben
-- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, Abel Braaksma | Thread | [xsl] Storing XML doc refs in varia, Rick Livesey |
Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] EXSLT support for firefox, Florent Georges |
Month |