Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?

On 4/16/07, Rashmi Rubdi <rashmi.sub@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Each programming language is suited for a purpose, so use the
programming language that *you* know well and that accomplishes the
task easily.

It would be insane to transform an XML doc into HTML with Java, or ASP
- why not use a language that transforms it naturally?


I agree. I mean, I bet people would say FORTRAN is dead (and has been
for a while), but it's still quite alive and used in scientific areas.

XSLT may not be a buzzword anymore, but I don't think people will stop
using it this year.

-Katie

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:23:14 -0700 Steve - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:14:26 -0400 Earley, Jim - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:53:13 -0600 Rashmi Rubdi - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:42:01 -0400 Katie Kearns - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:46:45 -0700 <= Rashmi Rubdi - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:36:45 -0400 Abel Braaksma - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:05:41 +0200 Rashmi Rubdi - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:12:22 -0400 John Steel - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:52:42 +0100

Current Thread

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Rashmi Rubdi	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Rashmi Rubdi
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Rashmi Rubdi	Date	[xsl] Most meaningful design docume, Angela Williams
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home