Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL(2.0?) Transformer and RelaxNG From: Georges Schmitz <georges.schmitz@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:29:06 +0200 |
yes, and I often construct a "more qualified" key access on the fly likeI'm thinking of moving away from DTD towards RelaxNG, but what will happen to my tool chain? Especially loosing the possibility of fetching elements via id() and idref() would hurt me most.
Anything you can do with id() in XSLT can be done just as well with key() -
and arguably better, since you're less dependent on external factors to
ensure that the IDs are identified as such.
(And in Saxon-SA these days you don't really need to bother with key() either, you can just write //x[p='q'] and let the system take care of it).
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL(2.0?) Transformer and, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Segfault shutting down exslt/, Stephan Suerken |
Re: [xsl] Child locations, Luke Jones | Date | [xsl] Modify Variable value, Senthilkumaravelan K |
Month |