Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same document

["M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 27 May 2007 17:07:32 -0600, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>  
wrote:

> I wouldn't expect to see it used much at all in xslt2 for
> example.

yeah, there is definitely no need in XSLT 2.0.  Of course, my response  
regarding the cost of the GET request was based on my thought process  
being distracted long enough to suggest something as silly as including  
the cost of the GET request for a document that already exists inside of  
the transformation process.  This, of course, would be correct in cases  
where you use the document function to access an external document, but  
incorrect when you use it for introspection of the transformation file.

--
/M:D

M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |  
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155