Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing with MSXML 3.0 or MSXML 6.0 (WAS: XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB) From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:55:53 -0400 |
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:08 -0600, M. David Peterson wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:47:26 -0600, Manfred Staudinger > <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The other consideration was, should I upgrade to MSXML6 ? Sure I should, > > but when ? Would this mean to lose the ability to test with MSXML3 ? > > You see, many question marks, few if any answers (from MS). > > Just noticed that the source for the msxsl.exe utility is now available > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=2FB55371-C94E-4373-B0E9-DB4816552E41&displaylang=en > > Not sure if this will be of any help, but never noticed the source was > available before now. Something new? Well, regardless, this should be > easy enough to hack into specifying which version of MSXML to use during > the transformation. How about: var versions = ["Msxml2.DOMDocument.6.0", "Msxml2.DOMDocument.5.0", "Msxml2.DOMDocument.4.0", "Msxml2.DOMDocument.3.0", , "MSXML2.DOMDocument", "MSXML.DOMDocument", "Microsoft.XMLDOM"]; for (var i=0; i < versions.length; i++) { try { new ActiveXObject(versions[i]); alert("Using: " + versions[i]); break; } catch (e) {} } best, -Rob > > I think ;-)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing with MSXML 3.0 or, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Testing with MSXML 3.0 or, M. David Peterson |
RE: [xsl] Replacing default namespa, Paul Kiel | Date | Re: [xsl] Testing with MSXML 3.0 or, M. David Peterson |
Month |