Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hierarchy From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:53:37 +0100 |
> actually theres more than one item in your sequence that way. I may have mistyped, but you shouldn't need the [1]'s in for example $h[.+1][1] as $h[.+1] is %h[position()=.+1] so can return at most 1 item, so [1] is redundant. similarly $h[.+1][2] will always be empty. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen |
Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen | Date | Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen |
Month |