Subject: Re: [xsl] the document() in IE From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:13:07 +0100 |
> You say that my "workaround" is the same: > but that is only true if ah yes, in other words, what you said was right, and what I said was wrong:-) > So, if I understand you correctly, when IE removes the path information > (base uri) of the XSLT when it becomes a DOM object, it is still > behaving conformant. Though I do find it a bit strange, It conforms to _XSLT/XPath_ which says nothing about how the properties of the input trees are determined. Whether the DOM spec (or javascript spec or in similar server-side scenarios jaxp spec etc, specify what the base URI of the in-memory object is would have to be answered by someone who's read those specs more carefully than I have. (In some of the cases listed above I haven't looked at all...) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the document() in IE, Abel Braaksma | Thread | [xsl] Tricky transformation task, Jimmy |
Re: [xsl] the document() in IE, Abel Braaksma | Date | [xsl] variable as element name; iss, Thomas Kielczewski |
Month |