Subject: RE: Re: [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSLT - higher order functions From: cknell@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:09:18 -0400 |
You do yourself a favor when you listen to criticism, especially well-intentioned criticism from a source with experience in the field. -- Charles Knell cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email -----Original Message----- From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:52:36 -0700 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSLT - higher order functions > FXSL, unfortunately, is so powerful that I think many "ordinary" users find > it rather daunting. A gentler introduction, using examples from the world of > commercial IT systems rather than computer science, would help to sell it to > the general public. There is nothing so powerful in FXSL and it implements some most basic concepts. Concepts like: fold, map, compose, repeat/iterate -- form the alphabet of programming. Certainly, if someone has arrived at grade 5 in school and still doesn't know the alphabet, this person will find reading even ordinary text rather "daunting". To summarize, FXSL provides a big potential to learn, requires learning, and this is even a bigger value than simply the provided functionality. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play On 7/21/07, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am curious to know why some XSLT vendors have implemented > > one or more XSLT extension functions with their product to > > make for the implementation of higher-order functions (HOF) in XSLT. > > In the case of Saxon, it was needed by an XQuery user, and availability in > XSLT was just a spin-off. It's not possible to use the FXSL approach in > XQuery because it relies on xsl:apply-templates. In fact, this kind of > capability is needed much more in XQuery because even without FXSL, there > are many things you can do with xsl:apply-templates to handle dynamic > content that have no simple solution in XQuery. > > In fact, in business applications I far more often see the need for > saxon:evaluate() (in both XSLT and XQuery) where expressions are constructed > at run-time from strings. But saxon:evaluate() is easy to understand, and it > often gets used to solve problems where compile-time higher-order functions > would be a cleaner and more efficient solution. > > FXSL, unfortunately, is so powerful that I think many "ordinary" users find > it rather daunting. A gentler introduction, using examples from the world of > commercial IT systems rather than computer science, would help to sell it to > the general public. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] The generic numeric datat, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: Re: [xsl] Vendor extensions for, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSL, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Output to a file...and li, Naschke, Pete |
Month |