|
Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference betwen functions and templates From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:13:43 +0200 (CEST) |
David Carlisle wrote:
Hi
> it does mean that you can rewrite the vast majority of
> existing named templates as functions if you wish.
I think that the output state is the only context component that you
can't simulate in a function by passing it as a parameter. I hope I
don't forget any other.
Regards,
--drkm
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference bet, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] XPath for the selected node, v vijith |
| RE: [xsl] Parsing to a file..., Naschke, Pete | Date | Re: [xsl] Parsing to a file..., David Carlisle |
| Month |