Subject: Re: [xsl] Shorthand. From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:48:55 -0700 |
...I read and replied to what you quoted. In reply I provided the template I have, its usage in context, and my expected output.I also replied with my processor, etc. If something else was expected it was my mistake.
In case one gets such requests continuously, it is good to try to write any future message providing the information that was missing from previous messages -- not to repeat the same over and over again.
1. You -- because tryinhg to better formulate and think over a problem often leads to solving it without extra help.
2. People, who could reply -- less time to spend, no guessing, faster solution, higher productivity.
3. People, who may have questions of their own -- as your threads start consuming significantly less bandwidth and repliers' time there would be more bandwidth and time for solving the problems of other people, too.
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Shorthand., Steve | Thread | Re: [xsl] Shorthand., Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Shorthand., Steve | Date | [xsl] Open sourcing XSLT stuff, Justin Johansson |
Month |