Subject: RE: [xsl] Stepping through XPath in a visual XPath debugger From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:08:26 +0100 |
> a) What is the most intuitive order in which to step-through > an XPath 1.0 expression visually? I really don't know the answer to this, but I think anything that presents a view of the evaluation as a sequential process is misleading and likely to be unhelpful. The concept should be to select parts of the expression and understand what contribution they make to the result - for example, being able to see which nodes a particular predicate is applied to, and which of them match. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Stepping through XPath in a v, Philip Fearon | Thread | RE: [xsl] Stepping through XPath in, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] XSLamenT, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLamenT, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |