|
Subject: Re: [xsl] translate to XML using XSL into an HTML table From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:27:11 +0200 (CEST) |
B Tommie Usdin wrote:
Hi
> There is nothing at all wrong with talking about TAGs on
> XSL-List, when the discussion is about tags. In this case,
> the discussion is about an element, and it is important to
> use the jargon correctly.
> The "T-word", as Florent puts it, is not a dirty word on
> XSL-List. It is simply not an synonym of "element", and is
> something we rarely need to discuss in the context of XSL.
Yes, of course. But I think 99% of the time I saw it on
the list it was misused. This is a frequent mistake, and I
think this is a sympthom of misunderstanding XDM basics,
which are *really* important to write any stylesheet.
"Never" was maybe a little too strong, yes.
> (I am, perhaps, in too persnickety a mood - I am writing
^^^^^^^^^^^
Nice word. I have to remember this one ;-)
> from the International Workshop on Markup of Overlapping
> Structures. I am surrounded by markup geeks and we all
> seem to be deeply concerned about precise descriptions of
> very fuzzy concepts.)
Oh, I didn't notice Extreme started today. Pleasure to
all lucky attendees!
Regards,
--drkm
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Example to checkbox in X, Abel Braaksma (onlin | Thread | Re: [xsl] translate to XML using X, Abel Braaksma |
| RE: [xsl] Stepping through XPath in, Philip Fearon | Date | RE: [xsl] Format Number and Empy El, Michael Kay |
| Month |