Subject: RE: [xsl] Decimal alignment using fo:leader From: "Angela Williams" <Angela.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:49:03 -0500 |
Thanks, Ivan. I thought about that, but these tables are defined generically by a user. There is already so much overhead in determining whether to hide or render a column, calculating actual column numbers based on what's been hidden, calculating title spans, etc, that I did not want to introduce more complexity with additional, invisible columns. Although, I could if that is the only other alternative... In that case, I think I would need to calculate the width of the decimal part column to limit it to the actual width of the decimal value with the highest precision and the largest font size. Otherwise, I might still have an issue fudging right alignment? Both columns would need to fit within the defined column width for the original single column... Or am I making it too complicated? I'm really hoping that I am close in my current solution and someone with advanced xsl-fo skills will see some tiny detail I am overlooking in the alignment. :-) Thanks! Angela -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Bogouchev [mailto:ivan.bogouchev@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:05 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Decimal alignment using fo:leader Hi Angela, couldn't you just use two columns with invisible border between? Then you could put the integer part of the number (including the point) right aligned in the first column and the decimal part left aligned in the second.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Decimal alignment using f, Ivan Bogouchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Decimal alignment using f, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Decimal alignment using f, Ivan Bogouchev | Date | [xsl] Print parent text, Luke Jones |
Month |